De todas maneras, eso ya es cuestión de gustos. Las que te aconsejan por aquí los compañeros también están muy bien

Un saludo.
Sí: en cámaras digitales y escáners de sobremesa es una marca a tener muy en cuentaRommel escribió:Yo soy cannonista a muette!!
El archiconocido: Pisapapeles.Rommel escribió:Sí sí.
Esta es de vídeo. También tengo la Canon 450D de fotos y también estoy muy contento, aunque su 18-55 deja mucho que desear.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Revi ... eview.aspxFor the money, the Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens performs very well optically. From 18mm through 35mm or so, center sharpness is reasonable wide open and reaches its optimal sharpness at f/5.6. Corners in this focal length range are relatively sharp. Wide open center-of-the-lens performance remains similar throughout the focal length range until the long end where this lens becomes soft. At 55mm, even f/8 is not as sharp as I'd like to see.
Color is good but contrast could be a little better (this is most noticeable when comparing with the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens). CA is somewhat strong toward the corners but flare is very well controlled. Vignetting is not severe, but noticeable on the wide end.
Expect barrel distortion at the wide end and some pincushion distortion at the long end. You can see this distortion shift by rolling through the focal lengths in the ISO 12233 Chart tool. Watch the subject size change in the top-most image in these identically framed shots.